No. C8-84-1034 Precedential Reinstated Processed

In re Reinstatement of Southwell

Minnesota Supreme Court · Filed October 20, 1989 · 447 N.W.2d 422

Also decided on this docket: Minn., August 19, 1985 373 N.W.2d 592

Cited by

Explained in 1

State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Ramsey County Thissen, J. Minn. 2020
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Jamal Abdi Madar v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jamel Daniel Hoard v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Francisco Vincent Vargas v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Sara Elaine Katra v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Patrick Samuel Meszaros v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jose Manuel Flores v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Patrick Lawrence Zabinski Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State v. Hull 788 N.W.2d 91 Minn. 2010
Schneider v. State 725 N.W.2d 516 Minn. 2007

Opinion text

ORDER By order dated August 19, 1985, Brian C. Southwell was suspended from the practice of law by this court for a period of ninety (90) days. This suspension from the practice of law provided that he could not be reinstated until he had complied with certain terms of the suspension order. He has now filed with this court an affidavit stating that he has complied with the terms of that order. The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has likewise filed with this court an affidavit certifying that Brian C. Southwell has complied with the terms of the suspension order with two exceptions. The court having considered the affidavit of Brian C. Southwell and of the Director, IT IS NOW ORDERED that Brian C. Southwell is hereby reinstated to the practice of law effective immediately, subject to the following conditions: (1) he shall remain on voluntary restricted status until he has completed the requirements of the Minnesota Continuing Legal Education Board and is transferred by that board to active status and he shall thereafter promptly submit to the Director’s office proof of being reinstated to active status by the CLE Board; and (2) he shall be placed on supervised probation for a period of two years from the date of this order. The terms of the probation shall be those described in this court’s order dated August 19, 1985.